There is more than one path to a successful food company.

Choose yours wisely and be aware when best to build a professional operations setup.

Especially founders and early-stage food businesses should be aware of the different possibilities, opportunities, risks and important milestones.

๐—›๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ถ๐˜€ ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜ƒ๐—ถ๐—ฒ๐˜„ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐Ÿฏ ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐˜‚๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐˜ƒ๐—ฒ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐˜€ - ๐Ÿฎ ๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฎ ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ด๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐˜๐—ต; ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ฎ ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ฒ - that Iโ€™ve seen and โ€œstandardizedโ€ for better comparison based on my current knowledge. I also added example companies that grossly fit the described paths (how they started):

๐Ÿ“ˆ ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฒ (๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ):
Companies that often work with an โ€œup or outโ€-principle. Either they scale up or they are โ€œswallowed upโ€ by the market / competition, because the investors want their money back multiplied and quickly. This path is needed in a โ€œwinner takes it all marketโ€, or applied where founders & investors see an innovative business opportunity with large market potential.

--> Have all important operations processes ready to scale before the big launch event in order not to lose momentum once shareholders focus on growing revenues.
share, Planted, Infinite Rootsยฎ, PROJECT EADEN, Formo


๐Ÿฅ„ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (๐—ฒ๐˜…๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฒ):
Companies where the self-made products of the highest quality are the most important aspect for the founder. In the food space it would be someone who cooks or bakes their own loved products that they want to share with their friends and more people, and then they slowly turn this hobby into a business.

-->It can be enough to invest in a professional operations setup once all initial hypotheses are confirmed in online & offline tests (e.g. retail / food service) and the business reached profitability.
Veeze.de, djoon foods, Luicella's Ice


๐Ÿ‘ข ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด & ๐—ฏ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐˜๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด (๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—บ๐—ถ๐—ฑ๐—ฑ๐—น๐—ฒ): In between the two extremes above I've mostly seen this approach: Constantly testing hypotheses while not using too much capital and not taking too large risks, but speeding up when there's a good chance.

--> A professional operations setup becomes valuable once the company can start focusing on sales, because all initial hypotheses have been confirmed, the product is ready to scale & production is flexible enough, and customers are reliably recurring.
zeroLabs, Moruga Cacao, malunt, Foodasis GmbH


โ“๐—ช๐—ต๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐˜„๐—ถ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต๐˜€ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ฒ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ฟ ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฑ ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜-๐˜‚๐—ฝ? ๐—ช๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ต ๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฑ๐—ผ ๐˜†๐—ผ๐˜‚ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ ๐˜๐—ผ ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ธ๐—ฒ?
And are you happy with the path you took, or would you have taken some decisions differently based on new learnings?

While looking at illustrative paths, remember that every business is unique.

Zurรผck
Zurรผck

The biggest and most dangerous mistake that most founders make:

Weiter
Weiter

Operations and supply chain managers coming back from vacation